OEM EOSL Calendar · Pure Storage
Pure Storage EOSL Calendar — every milestone date, every active model
Pure Evergreen subscriptions encourage in-place controller upgrades, but post-Evergreen TPM economics are competitive on FlashArray //M and earlier //X platforms. TPM dominates for shops that have opted out of Evergreen or are running gear past the Evergreen-eligible window. WUC supports all Pure platforms below indefinitely post-LDoS.
Product calendar
Pure Storage products by family.
Each row shows full lifecycle milestones. Click a model to expand WUC commentary on TPM economics for that platform.
FlashArray //M (2)
| Model | End of Sale | EoSW Maint. | EoVS Maint. | LDoS | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FlashArray //M10 / //M20 | Apr 30, 2020 | Apr 30, 2024 | Apr 30, 2024 | Apr 30, 2025 | Post-LDoS |
| FlashArray //M50 / //M70 | Apr 30, 2020 | Apr 30, 2024 | Apr 30, 2024 | Apr 30, 2025 | Post-LDoS |
|
WUC commentary Post-LDoS. Higher-density //M tier. TPM economics dominant. Many shops extending well past LDoS where dataset growth is controlled. |
|||||
FlashArray //X (5)
| Model | End of Sale | EoSW Maint. | EoVS Maint. | LDoS | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FlashArray //X10 / //X20 R1 | Oct 31, 2024 | Oct 31, 2028 | Oct 31, 2028 | Oct 31, 2029 | Active |
|
WUC commentary Entry/mid-tier //X first-gen. Common in mid-market enterprise. Evergreen subscribers should evaluate controller upgrade path; non-Evergreen shops should compare TPM economics. |
|||||
| FlashArray //X50 R1 | Oct 31, 2024 | Oct 31, 2028 | Oct 31, 2028 | Oct 31, 2029 | Active |
|
WUC commentary Mid-tier //X workhorse. Largest installed Pure base in mid-market. TPM economics start to win year +3 post-EoS for non-Evergreen subscribers. |
|||||
| FlashArray //X70 / //X90 R1 | Oct 31, 2024 | Oct 31, 2028 | Oct 31, 2028 | Oct 31, 2029 | Active |
|
WUC commentary High-end //X first-gen. Common in tier-1 production. Evergreen upgrade to //X R3 is the preferred refresh; TPM is a viable alternative for shops with stable performance requirements. |
|||||
| FlashArray //X20 R3 / //X50 R3 | Apr 30, 2027 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2032 | Active |
|
WUC commentary Current-gen mid-tier //X. Evergreen makes sense through 2029; TPM evaluation reasonable post-EoS. |
|||||
| FlashArray //X70 R3 / //X90 R3 | Apr 30, 2027 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2032 | Active |
|
WUC commentary Current-gen high-end //X. Evergreen Forever subscribers retain controller-upgrade entitlement; TPM economics start to compete post-EoS. |
|||||
FlashArray //C (1)
| Model | End of Sale | EoSW Maint. | EoVS Maint. | LDoS | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FlashArray //C40 / //C60 | Apr 30, 2025 | Apr 30, 2029 | Apr 30, 2029 | Apr 30, 2030 | Active |
|
WUC commentary QLC-based capacity tier. Common for secondary storage / backup repositories. TPM economics strong for capacity-tier workloads where performance evolution is not critical. |
|||||
FlashArray //XL (1)
| Model | End of Sale | EoSW Maint. | EoVS Maint. | LDoS | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FlashArray //XL170 | Apr 30, 2027 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2032 | Active |
|
WUC commentary Highest-density Pure array — common in large enterprise tier-1 storage. Evergreen Forever appropriate while feature-roadmap consumption is active; TPM after. |
|||||
FlashBlade (3)
| Model | End of Sale | EoSW Maint. | EoVS Maint. | LDoS | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FlashBlade //S100 | Apr 30, 2027 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2032 | Active |
|
WUC commentary Entry-tier FlashBlade //S. Object + file scale-out. Common in AI/ML and analytics. Active feature evolution on FlashBlade OS — Evergreen appropriate. |
|||||
| FlashBlade //S200 | Apr 30, 2027 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2032 | Active |
|
WUC commentary Mid-tier FlashBlade //S. Higher-density unstructured-data workloads. TPM economics start to compete post-EoS. |
|||||
| FlashBlade //S500 | Apr 30, 2027 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2031 | Apr 30, 2032 | Active |
|
WUC commentary High-end FlashBlade //S. Top-end scale-out for unstructured. TPM viable post-EoS for stable workloads. |
|||||
How to use this calendar
The 30-day fleet review procedure.
If you maintain a Pure Storage fleet of any size, this four-step pass yields a 36-month refresh-and-TPM roadmap.
- 1
Pull asset inventory
Export your Pure Storage fleet from CMDB / spreadsheet / OEM portal. Minimum columns: serial number, model, install date, support contract end date.
- 2
Map against this calendar
Cross-reference each model against the table above. Flag every unit where LDoS lands within your refresh planning horizon (typically 18–36 months).
- 3
Bucket by economics
For each model bucket: refresh-now (year +1), refresh-soon (year +2), TPM-and-hold (LDoS +1 or beyond), evaluate-app-stack (LDoS dependent on application lifecycle).
- 4
Cost-compare per bucket
For TPM-and-hold gear, compare current OEM renewal cost vs WUC TPM quote vs replacement TCO. The math typically favors TPM at LDoS minus 12 months and beyond.
Run your Pure Storage renewal numbers against a real alternative.
Bring four data points to a 60-minute call and we'll map your Pure Storage fleet sequence:
- Current Pure Storage asset count
- Annual OEM maintenance spend
- Contract anniversary distribution
- Asset visibility state (CMDB, spreadsheet, none)
Reference data · Open to industry peers · Quarterly refresh cadence
WUC commentary
Post-LDoS. TPM is the only practical coverage path. Refresh target is //X20 R3 or //C40.