Data Center Relocation
Plan, stage, and execute physical data center moves with minimum production disruption — same-campus to cross-region.
- Site survey + cabling plan
- Move-day runbooks
- Insured + bonded execution
Strategic Infrastructure Execution
Professional services, engineered for outcomes — not billable hours.
WUC delivers data center relocation, rack & stack, smart hands, IMAC, and multi-vendor deployment services across the continental US — with OEM-trained engineers, project-management discipline, and deployment intelligence built into every engagement.
30-min consultation. Project scope confirmed before any work starts. Avg response: 2 hours.
94%¹
On-time project delivery, trailing 12 months
30+
OEM-trained engineers across Cisco, Dell, HPE, NetApp, Pure, Aruba, Juniper, Arista
4-hr
Field-coverage radius across continental US metros
Single-PM
Each project owned by one project manager — no handoffs
WUC operational delivery standards. Verifiable on request during the Assess phase.
Services Framework
Ten infrastructure services, one accountable execution model.
From single-site rack & stack to multi-region data center relocation — every engagement runs through the same Assess → Architect → Deploy → Optimize → Scale framework.
Rack & Stack
Rack mounting, structured cabling, port mapping, labeling, and power validation — for new deployments and refresh cycles across multi-vendor stacks.
- New build + refresh
- Structured cabling
- Port mapping + labeling
Smart Hands
Remote-directed onsite execution. Your team directs from the NOC, our engineer executes onsite. Hourly or block-hour engagements.
- Remote-directed work
- Hourly or block-hour
- Continental US coverage
IMAC Services
Install, Move, Add, Change. Recurring asset lifecycle work bundled into a single retainer — no per-ticket pricing surprise.
- Install + Move + Add + Change
- Asset tracking integrated
- Predictable retainer
Server & Storage Deployment
New server fleet builds and storage array installs across Dell, HPE, IBM, Cisco UCS, Lenovo, NetApp, Pure, Dell EMC. Rack-to-running.
- Multi-OEM coordination
- Firmware + cluster bring-up
- Validated handoff
Network Deployment
Switch / router / firewall / wireless deployments across Cisco, Juniper, Arista, Aruba, Palo Alto, Fortinet — fabric-aware design and execution.
- Multi-vendor fabric
- Routing-protocol cutover
- Optical lifecycle aware
Migration Services
Workload migration: physical-to-virtual, on-prem-to-on-prem, on-prem-to-colo. Pre-migration dependency mapping and rollback runbooks.
- Dependency mapping
- Wave-based cutover
- Rollback runbooks
Field Engineering
Scheduled onsite engineering across our field network. Continental US coverage with insured + background-checked engineers.
- Scheduled deployments
- Onsite project execution
- Insured + bonded
Infrastructure Audits
Asset cataloging, OEM-EOL mapping, contract gap analysis, capacity headroom — the input that makes Phase 2 of any engagement defensible.
- Full fleet catalog
- EOL roadmap
- Contract gap analysis
Lifecycle Consulting
Strategic infrastructure roadmap pairing maintenance, refresh, and modernization investment over 3–5 years — beyond transactional services.
- 3–5 year horizon
- Refresh + modernization
- Capital + opex modeling
Why WUC
WUC vs. the four ways enterprises buy infrastructure services today.
Every infrastructure project goes through one of four channels. Compare WUC against each one on the dimensions that determine project outcome — not just price.
| Capability | OEM PS Dell ProDeploy · HPE Pointnext PS · Cisco CX |
Reseller PS Insight · CDW · SHI · Connection |
DIY / Internal | WUC Technologies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-vendor coordination in single engagement | No — single-OEM | Procurement-adjacent | Yes | Yes — multi-OEM by design |
| Project management discipline (PMI / PRINCE2) | Yes | PM bundled with sales | — | Dedicated PM per engagement |
| Execution speed (small project: contract → live) | 8–16 weeks | 4–12 weeks | Resource-constrained | 2–6 weeks |
| Continental US field coverage | Subcontracted | Subcontracted | — | Direct + insured |
| Multi-OEM certifications across engineers | OEM only | Mixed | Variable | 30+ OEMs |
| EOSL hardware-aware deployments | No | Limited | Variable | Yes — bundled |
| Post-deployment maintenance integration | Separate contract | No | Separate buy | Single relationship |
| Predictive deployment intelligence | Limited | No | No | Dependency + risk modeling |
| Lifecycle consulting bundled | No | No | — | Quarterly review |
| Per-project pricing model | List price | Markup | — | Fixed-bid or T&M, your choice |
- Project execution timelines reference industry-standard ranges across major OEM PS organizations and reseller PS practices; actual durations vary by scope, fleet composition, and existing tooling.
Deployment Intelligence
Deployment intelligence — not deployment muscle.²
Most reseller PS shops bill billable hours. Most OEM PS organizations bill billable hours plus markup. The work is interchangeable. The differentiation evaporates the moment the engineer arrives onsite. WUC inverts the model.
Before any engineer ships, our deployment-intelligence platform builds a dependency map of the target environment, validates the proposed multi-vendor stack against known compatibility matrices, generates a migration runbook from existing telemetry, and risk-models the project against historical cutover patterns. The runbook is the deliverable. The execution is verification.
Migration runbook · pre-flight
Dependency map generated
Multi-vendor stack validated
Capacity + power model verified
Risk register documented
Rollback runbook drafted
Cutover window scheduled
Field engineers dispatched
Tools-down execution
All risks modeled before tools-down. Execution is verification.
Pre-deployment dependency mapping
Every connected system identified before the migration window opens. No surprises at 2 AM during cutover.
Multi-vendor stack validation
Does your Cisco fabric talk to your NetApp arrays talk to your VMware cluster? Validated, not assumed.
Runbook-as-deliverable
The runbook IS the project plan. Execution is verification, not improvisation.
Delivery Framework
Five stages from first conversation to scaled execution.
A systematic engagement model that procurement, IT operations, and finance can all sign off on — and reuse for every subsequent engagement.
1
Assess
Catalog the existing state. Asset inventory, network topology, OEM contracts, EOL exposure, capacity headroom. The output is a defensible baseline.
2
Architect
Design the target state. Multi-vendor stack, capacity model, migration sequence, rollback paths, project schedule with named risk register.
3
Deploy
Execute against the runbook. Field engineers onsite, NOC engineers paired remote, single PM accountable for cutover.
4
Optimize
Post-cutover validation, performance tuning, OEM telemetry onboarded into operational intelligence platform, hand-off to ongoing maintenance.
5
Scale
Multi-site rollout coordination, repeatable deployment templates, capacity-expansion planning. Project becomes program.
Risk Discipline
Projects fail differently than systems do. We engineer for both.
A system fails by exceeding a threshold. A project fails by missing a dependency or going over budget. Both need engineering discipline. Here's how WUC engineers project execution.
Pre-flight validation
Every deployment runbook is dry-run against a model of the target environment before any engineer ships. Surprise dependencies — the #1 cause of cutover failure — are surfaced in Architect phase, not at 2 AM during the maintenance window.
Change management discipline
Every change goes through a structured CAB review with rollback paths documented and tested. No silent changes. No undocumented configs. No surprises during the audit.
Insured + bonded execution
WUC field engineers are insured, bonded, and background-checked. Every onsite visit logged with photographic evidence. SOC 2-aware service delivery for regulated-industry deployments.
FAQ
Common questions from infrastructure leaders scoping their next engagement.
Continental US direct, with a 4-hour-drive radius for most metros. Multi-site rollouts coordinated through a single PM with regional engineer rosters. International engagements coordinated through partner network — scoped honestly during Assess phase.
Fixed-bid for defined scope (preferred by procurement). T&M for evolving scope (preferred by technical teams). Hybrid for phased projects where Phase 1 is fixed and Phase 2 onward depends on Phase 1 outcomes. Pricing model is your call, scoped during Assess.
PMI-aligned with PRINCE2 elements where appropriate. Each engagement has a dedicated PM, named risk register, weekly stakeholder review, structured CAB review for production changes, and runbook-driven execution. PM stays with the project end-to-end — no handoffs.
Yes — multi-vendor coordination is the central WUC PS differentiator vs OEM PS. Dell ProDeploy can deploy Dell. HPE Pointnext can deploy HPE. Neither can deploy your full multi-vendor stack as one engagement. WUC's engineer roster covers Dell, HPE, IBM, Cisco, NetApp, Pure, EMC, Aruba, Juniper, Arista, Palo Alto, Fortinet, VMware — under one project.
SOC 2-aware service delivery. NDA-coverable engagement. FIPS-validated engagement available for federal / public-sector deployments. Field engineers background-checked and bonded. Photographic incident logs for every onsite visit. Regulated-industry posture documented during contract negotiation.
Pre-deployment dependency mapping eliminates surprise dependencies. Wave-based migration limits blast radius. Rollback runbooks tested before tools-down. Weekend / off-hours scheduling by default. Dry-run rehearsals on critical cutovers. The goal is zero-downtime cutover; where that's impossible, the goal is documented planned downtime ≤ business-stakeholder-agreed window.
Yes — EOSL-aware deployment is core to how WUC engages. Other PS shops refuse to touch hardware past OEM EOL. WUC's TPM contracts cover EOSL hardware as a first-class case. Migrating off EOSL gear or extending its life — both viable paths, both planned during Assess.
Smallest: single-site rack-and-stack or 4-hour Smart Hands engagement. Largest: multi-region data center relocation with overlapping cutover windows. Both run through the same Assess → Architect → Deploy → Optimize → Scale framework — sized to scope, not abridged.